Country assessment

Norway

We assess Norway as Resilient (71.2). The country farms and lands roughly four million tonnes of seafood a year for a population of 5.57 million and still covers most of its own consumption of meat, milk and eggs, yet 92 per cent of the ingredients in its salmon feed and 93 per cent of the protein raw materials in its livestock feed are imported, and a 2025 domestic meat shortfall pushed direct meat imports up 76 per cent.[1][5][11][21][25]

What binds is feed rather than food or money: Norway scores strongly on access and affordability (91) and shock endurance (78), with only 1.2 per cent of the population unable to afford a healthy diet and an AAA/Aaa sovereign rating lifting the financing constraint that binds most importers in a crisis.[27][34]

Norway's protein industry is a conversion business, and the sovereign wealth fund can pay for the inputs without being able to grow them.

The protein system

Norway is one of the largest net protein exporters on earth relative to its population. In 2024 it sold 1,552,887 tonnes of farmed Atlantic salmon and 95,863 tonnes of rainbow trout, and landed a further 2.34 million tonnes of wild fish worth EUR 2.47 billion.[1][2] In 2025 it exported 2.8 million tonnes of seafood worth NOK 181.5 billion to more than 150 markets, with aquaculture (chiefly salmon) supplying 73 per cent of that value and salmon alone worth NOK 124.7 billion.[3] Domestic food supply runs at 125.5 grams of protein per person per day, among the highest recorded anywhere.[22]

Terrestrial agriculture is small, protected and close to self-sufficient in animal products, though less so than a year earlier. Norwegian production covered 87 per cent of beef supply, 96 per cent of pork, 96 per cent of lamb and 99 per cent of chicken in 2025, down from 92, 98, 97 and 99 per cent respectively in 2024 as a domestic shortfall pulled in more imported meat, dairies took delivery of 1,480 million litres of milk in 2024, and domestic eggs covered 97 per cent of wholesale sales in 2025 as an earlier period of under-supply eased.[4][25] Below that layer the system thins out quickly. Only 2.2 per cent of Norway's land area is arable, equivalent to 0.146 hectares per inhabitant.[21] Cereal output has been flat at around 1.2 million tonnes since the early 1990s, reaching a preliminary 1,213,700 tonnes in 2025 even as the grain area fell by more than 500,000 decares.[5][6] Only about 28 per cent of the grain used by Norwegian flour mills in 2024-2025 was Norwegian, and the wheat share was 25 per cent.[4] Measured on energy, agricultural self-sufficiency was 40.7 per cent in 2025, or 35.7 per cent corrected for imported feed, against a government target of 50 per cent on the corrected basis.[7][9]

The two halves of the system rest on different foundations. The wild fishery needs no purchased inputs. Everything else runs on 2.19 million tonnes of aquafeed and 1.98 million tonnes of concentrate feed a year, and both are import-dependent.[1][4]

Durable domestic capacity: 75

Quantitative score 80, adjusted down 5 points

On protein alone Norway produces a large multiple of what its population needs, from a renewable base under formal scientific management. The indicators put capacity at 80, reflecting near-complete self-sufficiency across the animal products Norwegians eat, a seafood output of roughly 4 million tonnes live weight against 5.57 million people, and one of the highest per-capita protein supplies in the index.[1][2][4][21][22] We deduct 5 points, taking the pillar to 75, because those self-sufficiency percentages are computed on delivered volumes and conceal the input contingency underneath. A Norway restricted to domestic inputs could not sustain 347,000 tonnes of meat, 1.48 billion litres of milk or 1.65 million tonnes of farmed salmonids, since the protein fraction of its concentrate feed was 93 per cent imported across 2020 to 2023.[5] The input-free component is also shrinking: the 2026 cod quota was cut 16 per cent to 285,000 tonnes, the lowest since 1991, and capelin stayed closed for a second year.[15]

Resource headroom: 60

Quantitative score 55, adjusted up 5 points

Norway converts feed into protein more efficiently than nearly any competing system and has almost nowhere left to expand. Salmon farming consumed 2,185,945 tonnes of feed to produce 1.65 million tonnes of salmonids in 2024, an economic feed conversion ratio near 1.33 on our calculation, far better than terrestrial livestock.[1] Marine ingredients made up 22.4 per cent of salmon feed in 2020, split between 12 per cent fishmeal and 10 per cent fish oil, and only about a third of the meal and 30 per cent of the oil came from trimmings, so the balance draws on wild stocks.[11][13] Those stocks are contracting, with cod at a 35-year quota low and capelin, a feed-grade species, closed.[15]

On land there is no headroom at all. Arable area per person is 0.146 hectares and falling, fertiliser application already averages 205 kilogrammes per hectare of arable land, and most Norwegian farmland can grow little other than grass.[10][21] Sea space is limited by biology rather than by geography: 56.5 million farmed salmon died in sea cages in 2024, and the Veterinary Institute identifies wounds, delousing damage and complex gill disease as the leading causes.[1][16] We apply an upward adjustment of five points because Norway holds two primary resources in genuine surplus that land statistics ignore. Renewable internal freshwater stands at around 70,000 cubic metres per person per year, and 89.9 per cent of a 161,793 GWh electricity system is hydropower, with net exports of 22,800 GWh in 2025.[17][21] That capability is running now, not merely planned, and it underpins recirculating smolt production and the cold chain, though it cannot create arable land or restock a fishery.

Land area equipped for irrigation fell from 134,000 hectares in 2000 to 77,400 hectares in 2024, a decline of 42.2 per cent that outpaced the 8.4 per cent fall in arable land over the same period, so the irrigation-equipped share of arable land fell, from 15.2 to 9.6 per cent, rather than rising the way a shrinking denominator alone would produce. Even that smaller equipped base is underused: in the years with data, area actually irrigated ran at around 40 per cent of equipped capacity, 33,700 of 83,850 hectares in 2016.[35] There is no unused irrigation margin behind the +5. Arable land and cropland both contracted over 2000-2024, arable from 879,000 to 805,000 hectares and cropland from 884,000 to 809,000 hectares, 8.4 and 8.5 per cent absolute and around 26 per cent per person once population growth is priced in.[35] FAOSTAT carries no agriculture-specific credit series for Norway, only undifferentiated Total Credit in every year 2001-2024; Landkreditt Bank, the farmer-owned cooperative bank founded in 1915, nonetheless manages roughly NOK 38 billion in assets built on purpose-made agricultural lending, so the gap is a reporting gap over a functioning institution rather than evidence of capital scarcity.[36][37] Norway runs no flagship land-expansion programme. Its national land programme is defensive: the jordvern strategy caps farmland lost to conversion at 3,000 decares a year through 2025 and 2,000 decares a year from 2030, and actual conversion of 3,500 decares in 2022 and 2,700 decares in 2023 sits inside the looser ceiling but above the tighter one.[38] Municipal approvals for new cultivation ran to 21,600 decares in 2020, the most recent year published, an order of magnitude larger than the land lost to conversion, yet the national arable-land total still fell over the same window, which points to informal abandonment of marginal farms outweighing both formal gains and formal losses.[39] None of this touches the water and energy grounds the +5 rests on; it confirms rather than displaces the zero land headroom already reflected in the indicators.

Import exposure: 70

Quantitative score 74, adjusted down 4 points

Direct protein imports remain small in absolute terms but rose sharply in 2025. Norway brought in 12,404 tonnes of beef, 4,616 tonnes of pork, 959 tonnes of lamb and 1,108 tonnes of chicken, a combined 19,087 tonnes across the four core meat types, up 76 per cent on the 10,821 tonnes imported in 2024, while still exporting 2.8 million tonnes of seafood.[3][4][25] The increase followed a domestic production shortfall serious enough that Landbruksdirektoratet reopened general tariff reductions across all four meat categories mid-year; beef imports alone rose 67 per cent to 12,404 tonnes and pork imports rose 125 per cent to 4,616 tonnes, pulling the Norwegian share of beef supply down to 87 per cent, its lowest level in several years, from 92 per cent in 2024.[25] On the wider tariff definition that also captures processed meat products, Landbruksdirektoratet's companion report puts total 2025 meat imports at 27,300 tonnes, up 45 per cent in value and roughly 50 per cent in volume on 2024.[26] Egg imports moved the other way, nearly halving to 2,234 tonnes as domestic production recovered and egg self-sufficiency rose to 97 per cent.[25] Bread grain is the other exception: the milling quota was set at 225,000 tonnes for 2024-2025 after 210,537 tonnes were imported in the previous season at 99 per cent quota utilisation.[4] Total agricultural imports reached NOK 125.5 billion in 2025, up 6.1 per cent in value, dominated by EU suppliers with the Netherlands the largest by value.[23]

Route exposure is still close to negligible. Norwegian food and feed comes from the EU overland and by short sea, from Brazil across the open Atlantic, and from the North Atlantic fishery itself, with nothing material transiting Hormuz, Suez, Malacca or Panama.[11][23] We apply a downward adjustment of four points for two structural qualifications. The import basket is concentrated on a single market to which Norway does not belong, so access rests on the EEA agreement and on EU crisis policy. And the volume of grain and meat Norway may import cheaply is an administratively set quota or tariff reduction, resized to the harvest and reopened when the domestic market runs short, which is a policy variable rather than an entitlement; 2025 was the clearest demonstration of that variable being exercised across an entire product category.[4][25]

Upstream dependence: 47

Quantitative score 42, adjusted up 5 points

This is Norway's weakest pillar and its binding constraint. Ninety-two per cent of salmon feed ingredients were imported in 2020, with only 8 per cent originating in Norwegian fisheries or aquaculture.[11] Soy protein concentrate was the single largest ingredient at 20.9 per cent of the mix, vegetable protein sources made up 41 per cent of the feed, and 81 per cent of the soy protein came from South America.[11][12][13] Denofa's Fredrikstad crush alone processes about 450,000 tonnes of soybeans a year, 60 to 80 per cent of them Brazilian.[14] Concentration risk in this chain has already played out rather than sitting as a hypothetical: 25 per cent of the rapeseed oil and more than 10 per cent of all feed ingredients came from Russia in 2020, a dependence that had to be unwound after February 2022.[11][13]

Terrestrial livestock is in a similar position. Of 1.98 million tonnes of concentrate feed sold in 2024, split between 992,000 tonnes for ruminants, 518,000 tonnes for poultry and 454,000 tonnes for pigs, the Norwegian share of raw materials was 51 per cent, nine percentage points lower than in 2023.[4] Protein raw materials constituted 19.6 per cent of the mix and were 93 per cent imported.[4][5] The domestic alternative is small: NIBIO estimates that peas and faba beans grown in rotation on the existing grain area could yield around 20,000 tonnes of protein a year, against roughly 24,000 tonnes of beans and peas actually harvested in 2022, so Norway's own analysts conclude that a shift to home-grown protein would move the total Norwegian share of concentrate feed only slightly.[5] Novel ingredients remain marginal at 0.4 per cent of salmon feed volume, about 8,000 tonnes.[13]

Against this, three upstream inputs are sovereign. Yara Porsgrunn operates Europe's largest NPK complex at 2,115,000 tonnes a year and exports about 75 per cent of it, so Norway is a fertiliser supplier to the world rather than a supplicant.[20] Energy is domestic and renewable.[17] Salmon breeding stock is Norwegian and exported. We apply an upward adjustment of five points on those grounds, and because the aggregate feed figure overstates the exposure of the protein Norwegians eat: the larger half of national output by volume, the wild fishery, uses no formulated feed at all.[2]

Access and affordability: 91

Quantitative score 91, no adjustment applied

Norway sits near the top of the global distribution on every affordability outcome check available. The World Bank's Cost of a Healthy Diet series puts the share of Norwegians unable to afford a healthy diet at 1.2 per cent in 2025, essentially unchanged since 2021, at a diet cost of PPP $4.91 per person per day.[27] An unaffordability share below 2 per cent places this pillar in the top scoring band, and the components below put Norway near the foot of that band rather than at its ceiling. Prevalence of undernourishment sits at 2.5 per cent, the floor the World Bank and FAO report for very low-prevalence countries.[28] No child stunting estimate has been modelled for Norway by the UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Joint Malnutrition Estimates group, though the country's health system offers near-universal antenatal and paediatric coverage.[29]

The one identified weakness is price volatility rather than access. Eurostat's harmonised food price index for Norway rose 11.5 per cent year-on-year in December 2022, peaked at 13.2 per cent in June 2023, stood at 8.8 per cent in December 2023, fell back to 3.9 per cent in December 2024 and ran at 5.2 per cent in December 2025.[30] Two years of double-digit food inflation followed by a re-acceleration is well outside Norges Bank's 2 per cent target and wider than the low unaffordability headcount alone would suggest, and it is the reason this pillar does not score even higher. Physical access is strong but not frictionless: Norway's Logistics Performance Index score of 3.7 out of 5 reflects excellent core infrastructure set against a population spread along fjords and Arctic islands that depend on ferry and short-haul air links exposed to winter weather.[31] We apply no adjustment. The quantitative indicators already capture both the strength of the outcome and the one weakness we could identify, and none of the admissible qualitative grounds applies here.

Shock endurance: 78

Quantitative score 73, adjusted up 5 points

Norway holds the deepest fiscal buffer of any entity in this index and among the thinnest physical reserves. The Government Pension Fund Global stood at NOK 21,268 billion at the end of 2025 after a 15.1 per cent return, which is roughly NOK 3.8 million per inhabitant on our calculation and gives Norway the ability to outbid essentially any competitor for grain, feed or protein.[18][21] Physical stocks are only now being rebuilt. Grain reserves were closed in 2003,[24] and by early 2026 Landbruksdirektoratet had signed contracts covering the entire 82,500-tonne target for 2029, in three tranches: 30,000 tonnes for 2024-25, 30,000 tonnes for 2026-27 and the remaining 22,500 tonnes for 2028-29, described by the government as three months of population consumption, with an initial NOK 63 million allocated in the first year's state budget.[19] There is no comparable reserve of feed or feed protein, which is precisely where the system is thinnest.

Substitution capacity is the offsetting strength. Most Norwegian farmland can only produce grass, so ruminant milk and meat can continue on domestic forage if concentrate supply is interrupted.[10] Broiler cycles are short enough for poultry to respond within months, as the sector did when borders closed during the pandemic.[4] Energy for the fleet and the cold chain is domestic.[17] We apply an upward adjustment of five points for the substitution route that no stock-to-use ratio captures: a 2.34 million tonne wild catch landed inside Norway's own exclusive economic zone against a population of 5.57 million, currently almost entirely exported and divertible to domestic consumption within a single season with no imported input.[2][21] The 2023 harvest failure illustrates the same capability from the financial side, when food wheat output collapsed from 274,100 tonnes to 56,400 tonnes and self-sufficiency fell from 46.6 to 41.3 per cent with no disruption to consumers.[8][9]

Norway's central bank reserves cover a middling 4.37 months of imports, worth USD 85.49 billion,[32][33] which on its own would not be a distinguishing figure. The decisive fact is market access: Norway carries an AAA rating from S&P, unchanged since 1990, and an Aaa rating from Moody's affirmed in April 2026, both on stable outlook, so the financing constraint that limits most importers in a crisis does not bind here, and that is on top of the Government Pension Fund Global's NOK 21,268 billion.[18][34] Crisis purchasing power scores 77, near the ceiling, on the Government Pension Fund Global and top-tier sovereign ratings. Combined with the physical substitution and reserve evidence already described, the indicators put endurance at 73. No World Bank ASPIRE or comparable figure quantifies how far Norwegian social protection scaled during a specific past shock such as COVID-19; purchasing power here rests instead on reserve adequacy, sovereign credit ratings and the Government Pension Fund Global.

Trajectory

Three things would change Norway's picture. The first is feed. Every serious route to raising the upstream pillar runs through substituting domestic biomass for imported soy and rapeseed, whether pulses, marine by-products, insect meal, single-cell protein or algae. Norwegian analysts are candid that pulses on the current grain area can supply only around 20,000 tonnes of protein a year, and novel ingredients remain at 0.4 per cent of aquafeed volume, so the credible near-term gain is small and none of it is credited here.[5][13] The second is the reserve programme, now fully contracted for its 82,500-tonne 2029 target, which will lift endurance modestly as the stock physically fills, though it covers bread grain rather than feed.[19] The third is the resource base: cod at a 35-year quota low and capelin closed for two seasons mean the input-free half of the system is delivering less, and a further round of cuts would pull capacity and headroom down together.[15]

The direction of risk is worth stating plainly. Norway's food supply is secure and its protein industry is exposed. A disruption to Brazilian soy protein concentrate, to European rapeseed or to the marine oil market would hit an export sector worth NOK 181.5 billion long before it reached a Norwegian dinner table.[3] That asymmetry is why Norway scores 78 on endurance and 91 on access and affordability while scoring only 47 on upstream dependence, the pillar that holds the overall score back despite the wealth, protein surplus and affordability evident elsewhere.

The 2025 meat-import surge is a second trend worth watching rather than a one-off. Landbruksdirektoratet attributes it to an ordinary domestic production shortfall rather than a structural break, and it forecasts the underdekning continuing into 2026 with further general tariff reductions likely for beef in particular.[25] If a shortfall of this kind recurs or widens in consecutive years, the import-exposure pillar would need to move further; one year of data is a materialisation of an already-flagged risk, not yet evidence of a new structural dependency.

Sources

  1. Key figures from Norwegian Aquaculture Industry 2024 · Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries (2025)
  2. Norway country profile: fisheries and aquaculture statistics · Eurofish (2025)
  3. Price growth for wild fish and increased salmon volume resulted in record value for Norwegian seafood exports in 2025 · Norwegian Seafood Council (2026)
  4. Markedsrapport 2024 (Rapport nr. 3/2025) · Landbruksdirektoratet (Norwegian Agriculture Agency) (2025)
  5. Gjennomgang av korn- og kraftfôrpolitikken, report of the joint working group to the 2025 agricultural settlement · Landbruksdirektoratet (2025)
  6. Cereals and oil seeds, area and yields · Statistics Norway (SSB) (2026)
  7. Selvforsyningsgrad og engrosforbruk · NIBIO (Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research) (2026)
  8. Selvforsyningsgrad, in Utviklingen i norsk kosthold 2025 · Helsedirektoratet (Norwegian Directorate of Health) (2025)
  9. Different calculation methods can lead to major variations in food self-sufficiency rates · NIBIO (2026)
  10. Nine facts about Norwegian agriculture · NIBIO (n.d. (data to 2024))
  11. Conceptualization of the Norwegian feed system of farmed Atlantic salmon · Frontiers in Marine Science 11:1378970 (2024)
  12. Utilization of feed resources in the production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway: an update for 2020 · Aas, Åsgård and Ytrestøyl, Aquaculture Reports (Nofima) (2022)
  13. Report: more Norwegian salmon feed producers are using novel fish feed ingredients · Global Seafood Alliance (summary of Nofima 2022) (2022)
  14. Soy (sourcing and volumes) · Denofa (2026)
  15. Norwegian-Russian Fisheries Agreement for 2026 · Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries (regjeringen.no) (2025)
  16. Fiskehelserapporten 2024 (Fish Health Report 2024) · Norwegian Veterinary Institute (2025)
  17. Electricity · Statistics Norway (SSB) (2026)
  18. Annual Report 2025 · Norges Bank Investment Management (2026)
  19. 82 500 tonn matkorn på lager innen 2029 - er i mål med kontrakter · Landbruksdirektoratet (2026 (published Aug 2025, updated Jan 2026))
  20. Yara Porsgrunn (production capacity and export share) · Yara (2026)
  21. World Development Indicators: arable land, fertiliser consumption, renewable internal freshwater, population, GDP per capita · World Bank (2026 (data 2022-2024))
  22. Food Balance Sheets: protein supply quantity, Norway, Grand Total · FAOSTAT (FAO) (2026 (data 2023))
  23. Økt import og eksport av jordbruksvarer i 2025 · Landbruksdirektoratet (2026)
  24. Norge hadde kornlagre i tilfelle krise, så ble de tømt · Klikk.no (2024)
  25. Markedsrapport 2025 (Rapport nr. 2/2026) · Landbruksdirektoratet (Norwegian Agriculture Agency) (2026 (published 13.02.2026))
  26. Omverdenen til norsk landbruk og matindustri - rapport for 2025 (Rapport nr. 3/2026) · Landbruksdirektoratet (Norwegian Agriculture Agency) (2026 (published 13.02.2026))
  27. Food Prices for Nutrition: Cost of a Healthy Diet (CoHD_headcount, CoHD_PPP) · World Bank (2026 (data to 2025))
  28. World Development Indicators: Prevalence of undernourishment (SN.ITK.DEFC.ZS, FAO data) · World Bank / FAO (2026 (data 2023))
  29. World Development Indicators: Prevalence of stunting, height for age (SH.STA.STNT.ZS) · World Bank (UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Joint Malnutrition Estimates) (2026 (no value returned for Norway))
  30. Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices - monthly data (annual rate of change), food and non-alcoholic beverages, Norway (prc_hicp_manr) · Eurostat (2026 (data to Dec 2025))
  31. Logistics Performance Index, overall score (LP.LPI.OVRL.XQ) · World Bank (2023)
  32. World Development Indicators: Total reserves in months of imports (FI.RES.TOTL.MO) · World Bank (IMF IFS data) (2026 (data 2025))
  33. World Development Indicators: Total reserves, includes gold (FI.RES.TOTL.CD) · World Bank (IMF IFS data) (2026 (data 2025))
  34. Norway credit rating (S&P and Moody's ratings aggregated) · Trading Economics (2026)
  35. Inputs: Land Use, Norway (Arable land, Cropland, Land area equipped for irrigation, Agriculture area actually irrigated), data · FAOSTAT (2026 (data 1961-2024))
  36. Investment: Credit to Agriculture, Norway, data · FAOSTAT (2026 (data checked 2001-2024))
  37. About Landkreditt (assets, membership, agricultural lending) · Landkreditt (2026)
  38. Mindre omdisponering av dyrka jord · Statistics Norway (SSB) (2024)
  39. Mindre nydyrking · Statistics Norway (SSB) (2021 (data 2020))

What we could not measure

The single most decision-relevant number for judging Norway's endurance, how many days of feed cover its mills and fish farms hold, is not publicly available. Feed-ingredient origins for Norwegian salmon are from 2020, when more than a tenth came from Russia or Belarus, and no update since means the current sourcing mix is unknown. Norway's import dependence for phosphate rock and potash was not established, so shock endurance leans on reserves and sovereign credit alone.

Published August 2026 ·How scores are produced